
Do we define art by the impact It has on us, or by who and how it was created? Is a piece less meaningful because an elephant or a computer painted it? Does the intention of an artist matter, or do we judge not on the intention by the impact?
As we plunge deeper into the debate — the defense of AI, or the defense of humanity — we’re forced to wrestle with essential questions: are we that special? What is it about our ineffable souls, our childlike vulnerability, even our empathy and failing memories, which can’t easily be copied by a more proficient machine?
Leave a Reply